There have been some recent developments concerning the depathologisation of trans people which frankly worry me. I do agree that GID is a bad diagnosis for transsexual people, our genders are not disordered. Many of us do need hormonal and surgical treatments and felt dysphoric and unhappy with our bodies and THAT was a condition, but our genders per se aren't. The diagnoses for other transgender people are problematic too, 'crossdressing' should not be pathologised.
However I have seen people recently wishing to remove GID from the DSM/ICD entirely and not suggesting that it is replaced by something else. There is a suggestion that we should be able to change our legal genders without having already gone through hormonal and/or surgical treatments. This would then allow HRT and corrective surgery to be mandated purely on physical grounds.
This isn't the only problem with this but is what I want to talk about here:
This presents a problem for non-binary people. In pretty much every country throughout the world the choices of legal gender are male or female. A neutrois person (for example) cannot be legally recognised as neutrois, nor can any other non-binary people have their genders recognised. So where would this model leave an MTN? They could either stay legally male and therefore have no access to treatment or become legally female which would open up a treatment path, however this treatment path wouldn't be ideal for a person who wants minimal hormones and genital nullification.
The current availability of surgery for such people is still very poor (but slowly improving), however in some cases it can be made available via a GID or GID:NOS diagnosis under the radar. If GID is removed from the DSM/ICD then non-binary people will not be able to do this. Binary trans people would have their surgeries mandated by their doctor and the whole 'gender identity treatment' system wouldn't exist. This would leave non-binary people unable to access anything.
( This gives me the fear )
However I have seen people recently wishing to remove GID from the DSM/ICD entirely and not suggesting that it is replaced by something else. There is a suggestion that we should be able to change our legal genders without having already gone through hormonal and/or surgical treatments. This would then allow HRT and corrective surgery to be mandated purely on physical grounds.
This isn't the only problem with this but is what I want to talk about here:
This presents a problem for non-binary people. In pretty much every country throughout the world the choices of legal gender are male or female. A neutrois person (for example) cannot be legally recognised as neutrois, nor can any other non-binary people have their genders recognised. So where would this model leave an MTN? They could either stay legally male and therefore have no access to treatment or become legally female which would open up a treatment path, however this treatment path wouldn't be ideal for a person who wants minimal hormones and genital nullification.
The current availability of surgery for such people is still very poor (but slowly improving), however in some cases it can be made available via a GID or GID:NOS diagnosis under the radar. If GID is removed from the DSM/ICD then non-binary people will not be able to do this. Binary trans people would have their surgeries mandated by their doctor and the whole 'gender identity treatment' system wouldn't exist. This would leave non-binary people unable to access anything.
( This gives me the fear )