Oh jeez.
I hate when newspapers report on transgendered people. This week was a cornucopia of fail.
First of all, a small flood happened. Pittsburgh, being on a river delta, has waters that rise every time there is a storm. There was a homeless woman stuck in an underground walkway as the waters rose higher. A river rescue took place to save her life and soon, every newspaper in the area reported on the event.
I don't know. Maybe I'm just sensitive. Maybe I'm stupid. I read through the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review's description of the events and I got that sinking feeling anytime I read something that involves a transperson, let alone someone in transition. It wasn't too bad: http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_551263.html
That's fine. Not the best. I mean, why does her gender have anything to do with the rescue? It's not like her identity somehow made it more difficult for the rescue to happen. 7/10. It's not the best, but I'll take it considering the worst that could be written.
Then I read the Post-Gazette's write-up of the situation. Oh wow: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08039/855797-53.stm
Okay, so first of all, foul on the pronouns. Second of all, what does the gender have to do with the rescue again? Am I somehow missing the fact that rescuing a "she" requires special equipment?
Granted, I don't know much about this woman's transition but I have heard of her before. if she is indeed the same MtF that I have heard of, I don't think she would prefer the male pronouns. What is with journalistic integrity today?
Argh :<
X-posted to my crappy journal
I hate when newspapers report on transgendered people. This week was a cornucopia of fail.
First of all, a small flood happened. Pittsburgh, being on a river delta, has waters that rise every time there is a storm. There was a homeless woman stuck in an underground walkway as the waters rose higher. A river rescue took place to save her life and soon, every newspaper in the area reported on the event.
I don't know. Maybe I'm just sensitive. Maybe I'm stupid. I read through the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review's description of the events and I got that sinking feeling anytime I read something that involves a transperson, let alone someone in transition. It wasn't too bad: http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_551263.html
That's fine. Not the best. I mean, why does her gender have anything to do with the rescue? It's not like her identity somehow made it more difficult for the rescue to happen. 7/10. It's not the best, but I'll take it considering the worst that could be written.
Then I read the Post-Gazette's write-up of the situation. Oh wow: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08039/855797-53.stm
Okay, so first of all, foul on the pronouns. Second of all, what does the gender have to do with the rescue again? Am I somehow missing the fact that rescuing a "she" requires special equipment?
Granted, I don't know much about this woman's transition but I have heard of her before. if she is indeed the same MtF that I have heard of, I don't think she would prefer the male pronouns. What is with journalistic integrity today?
Argh :<
( Read more... )
( My response )
X-posted to my crappy journal